DUAL Ports De-carbonising port business today - Feasibility of Hydrogen Bunkering
Year: 2019 Language: english Author: ITM Power Genre: Research papers Format: PDF Quality: eBook Pages count: 84 Description: A safety comparison was undertaken between LNG and liquefied hydrogen (LH2). It was concluded that due to the large quantities of stored energy, both these fuels potentially present a significant hazard, and require careful engineering controls. The differences in safety between the fuels is minimal, with hydrogen probably being safer if stored outdoors, and LNG probably safer if stored indoors. It was concluded that hydrogen is a viable fuel, with liquefied hydrogen being the preferred storage method. At present, there is insufficient liquefied hydrogen production available in Europe, and while this will change in the long-term, in the short-term, gaseous hydrogen is likely to be the most prevalent. This view was reinforced when it was confirmed that the Orkney Islands are likely to be receiving a gaseous hydrogen ferry for deployment in the near future. Gaseous hydrogen was therefore taken forwards for consideration in this bunkering system feasibility study. It was concluded what whilst the basic components for a bunkering systems are set, their configuration will change depending on the specifics of each customer. Thus, an approach was taken to design a modular and scalable system that could be readily adapted. The details of each module are provided.
Вы не можете начинать темы Вы не можете отвечать на сообщения Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения Вы не можете удалять свои сообщения Вы не можете голосовать в опросах Вы не можете прикреплять файлы к сообщениям Вы не можете скачивать файлы
DUAL Ports De-carbonising port business today - Feasibility of Hydrogen Bunkering
Language: english
Author: ITM Power
Genre: Research papers
Format: PDF
Quality: eBook
Pages count: 84
Description: A safety comparison was undertaken between LNG and liquefied hydrogen (LH2). It was concluded
that due to the large quantities of stored energy, both these fuels potentially present a significant
hazard, and require careful engineering controls. The differences in safety between the fuels is
minimal, with hydrogen probably being safer if stored outdoors, and LNG probably safer if stored
indoors.
It was concluded that hydrogen is a viable fuel, with liquefied hydrogen being the preferred
storage method. At present, there is insufficient liquefied hydrogen production available in
Europe, and while this will change in the long-term, in the short-term, gaseous hydrogen is likely
to be the most prevalent. This view was reinforced when it was confirmed that the Orkney Islands
are likely to be receiving a gaseous hydrogen ferry for deployment in the near future.
Gaseous hydrogen was therefore taken forwards for consideration in this bunkering system
feasibility study.
It was concluded what whilst the basic components for a bunkering systems are set, their
configuration will change depending on the specifics of each customer. Thus, an approach was
taken to design a modular and scalable system that could be readily adapted. The details of each
module are provided.
Contents
Screenshots
feasibility-of-hydrogen-bunkering-final-080419.pdf
Скачать [4 KB]
Поделиться